Comments on: InnoDB plugin compression with benchmarks http://northernmost.org/blog/innodb-plugin-compression-with-benchmarks/ Just another manic Monday Mon, 23 Aug 2010 17:02:16 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Simon J Mudd http://northernmost.org/blog/innodb-plugin-compression-with-benchmarks/comment-page-1/#comment-1407 Simon J Mudd Tue, 22 Jun 2010 09:11:55 +0000 http://northernmost.org/blog/?p=26#comment-1407 These are all quite old posts, is there anything newer anywhere as the plugin is now at 1.0.8. You also deliberately used RAMDISK to see the processing time and ignore disk seeks. With small disk storage the access to disks should go down so it may make things much better using the compressed format. I need to do some similar benchmarking. Perhaps I'll post my results. These are all quite old posts, is there anything newer anywhere as the plugin is now at 1.0.8.

You also deliberately used RAMDISK to see the processing time and ignore disk seeks. With small disk storage the access to disks should go down so it may make things much better using the compressed format.

I need to do some similar benchmarking. Perhaps I’ll post my results.

]]> By: admin http://northernmost.org/blog/innodb-plugin-compression-with-benchmarks/comment-page-1/#comment-303 admin Thu, 03 Jul 2008 13:27:31 +0000 http://northernmost.org/blog/?p=26#comment-303 Hi Vasil, Thanks for your comment! The connect/disconnect times are not part of any of those numbers. I bumped up the number of runs, but there were still no relevant dispersion between the figures; 1K select time: 106.01854610443 seconds. 4K select time: 106.24008703232 seconds. 8K select time: 106.45072197914 seconds. NC select time: 106.47057890892 seconds. Hi Vasil,

Thanks for your comment!

The connect/disconnect times are not part of any of those numbers. I bumped up the number of runs, but there were still no relevant dispersion between the figures;

1K select time: 106.01854610443 seconds.
4K select time: 106.24008703232 seconds.
8K select time: 106.45072197914 seconds.
NC select time: 106.47057890892 seconds.

]]> By: Vasil Dimov http://northernmost.org/blog/innodb-plugin-compression-with-benchmarks/comment-page-1/#comment-298 Vasil Dimov Wed, 02 Jul 2008 06:49:53 +0000 http://northernmost.org/blog/?p=26#comment-298 Hi, 1.x second seems too little. Are you also measuring the time to connect and disconnect to the server in those SELECT queries? Better to test something that takes at least 60 seconds or so. Hi,

1.x second seems too little. Are you also measuring the time to connect and disconnect to the server in those SELECT queries? Better to test something that takes at least 60 seconds or so.

]]> By: compact disks http://northernmost.org/blog/innodb-plugin-compression-with-benchmarks/comment-page-1/#comment-258 compact disks Fri, 20 Jun 2008 18:37:50 +0000 http://northernmost.org/blog/?p=26#comment-258 [...] for some time now. I first tried the shortcut and downloaded the precompiled plugin, but got linkerhttp://northernmost.org/blog/innodb-plugin-compression-with-benchmarks/ITG Introduces DiscXpressIITM at American Library Association Annual Conference 2008 Business Wire [...] [...] for some time now. I first tried the shortcut and downloaded the precompiled plugin, but got linkerhttp://northernmost.org/blog/innodb-plugin-compression-with-benchmarks/ITG Introduces DiscXpressIITM at American Library Association Annual Conference 2008 Business Wire [...]

]]> By: Luca http://northernmost.org/blog/innodb-plugin-compression-with-benchmarks/comment-page-1/#comment-201 Luca Tue, 03 Jun 2008 01:00:38 +0000 http://northernmost.org/blog/?p=26#comment-201 Very interesting! I do believe you're on the right track with your theory on the select results. It make a lot of sense! Thanks, great post! Very interesting! I do believe you’re on the right track with your theory on the select results. It make a lot of sense!
Thanks, great post!

]]>